Introducing new number plates (see related story) in 2027 seems like a sensible move. The reason is a downward shift in terms of revenue received, presumably because effective checks proved harder with just new stickers every year.
According to Finance Minister Marinka Gumbs, the latter was intended to rely more on camera enforcement rather than police controls, but the country has not yet reached that stage. Recent collection figures indeed indicate a significant loss of related income.
Authorities are also studying a revised fee structure based on the weight of the vehicle. “I think that’s only fair. I don’t believe someone who can afford a BMW, for example, should pay the same amount as someone who has an i10,” she added.
The minister sent a firm message to motorists too: those who have not paid the previous year’s motor vehicle tax must do so in addition to paying for the current year. “There was a discrepancy between persons saying I want to pay for 2026 but I did not pay for 2025, do I still have to pay for 2025, and I am saying, yes you do because it’s unfair to those who actually paid for 2025 and going to pay for 2026 but you did not.”
She has a point, but questions remain. What if the car was inoperable and/or not on the road all last year? Perhaps some proof like a garage invoice could be accepted should such situations occur?
In any case, improving compliance in general deserves support also to promote a level playing field among drivers. Equally important is making sure proceeds end up in a dedicated Road Fund, as is legally required and was recently called for once again by the General Audit Chamber.
