Trump administration retreats on census citizenship question

NEW YORK/WASHINGTON--In a stinging defeat for President Donald Trump, his administration ended its effort to add a citizenship question to the 2020 U.S. census, saying that it will begin printing forms that do not include the contentious query.


  White House and Justice Department officials confirmed the decision, which came in the aftermath of a Supreme Court ruling on June 27 that faulted the administration for its original attempt to add the question. "I respect the Supreme Court but strongly disagree with its ruling regarding my decision to reinstate a citizenship question on the 2020 census," Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said in a statement.
  "The Census Bureau has started the process of printing the decennial questionnaires without the question. My focus, and that of the bureau and the entire department, is to conduct a complete and accurate census," Ross said.
  Although the Supreme Court left open the possibility of the administration adding the question, there was little time left for the government to come up with a new rationale. The government had said in court filings that it needed to finalize the details of the questionnaire by the end of June.
  After the ruling, Trump tweeted that he was consulting lawyers about delaying the census so that the question could be added.
  Critics have called the citizenship question a Republican ploy to scare immigrants into not taking part in the population count and engineer an undercount in Democratic-leaning areas with high immigrant and Latino populations. That would benefit non-Hispanic whites and help Trump's fellow Republicans gain seats in the U.S. House of Representatives and state legislatures, the critics said.
  “In light of the Supreme Court's ruling, the Trump administration had no choice but to proceed with printing the 2020 census forms without a citizenship question. Everyone in America counts in the census, and today's decision means we all will,” said Dale Ho, a lawyer with the American Civil Liberties Union, which had fought the Trump administration in court.
  The Trump administration had told the courts that its rationale for adding the question was to better enforce a law that protects the voting rights of racial minorities. Critics called that rationale a pretext, with the Supreme Court's majority embracing that theory.
  The court's 5-4 ruling, which saw conservative Chief Justice John Roberts join the court's four liberals in the majority, ultimately proved decisive.

The Daily Herald

Copyright © 2020 All copyrights on articles and/or content of The Caribbean Herald N.V. dba The Daily Herald are reserved.


Without permission of The Daily Herald no copyrighted content may be used by anyone.

Comodo SSL
mastercard.png
visa.png

Hosted by

SiteGround
© 2025 The Daily Herald. All Rights Reserved.