Dear Editor,
I just read the letter submitted to an on-line media outlet by a “Concerned Citizen” regarding former MP Theo Heyliger’s depicted use of a cell phone in the Point Blanche prison. While the letter raises important questions about prison security, the integrity of the justice system, and the potential misuse of political influence, I must take issue with the author’s choice to remain anonymous.
If the concerns raised in the letter are truly driven by civic duty and a desire for transparency, it is only fair that the author stands behind his/her words. Anonymity, especially in matters so politically charged, undermines the integrity of the claims and invites suspicion about the true intent behind them. If you (the author) have nothing to hide, why withhold your identity?
For collective “us” to contribute positively to the maturing of our community, we deserve open and honest discourse, not veiled attacks that aim to embarrass individuals without full accountability. If there is genuine concern about wrongdoing, let the investigation proceed without the added distraction of shadowed motives. I urge those who feel strongly about these issues to step forward, whether as individuals or through proper legal channels, so that real progress can be made in holding those responsible accountable.
The need for a transparent investigation into things like cell phones in prison is one thing. A second thing, however, is that the public’s trust is best built on clarity and openness, both from the authorities and from those who claim to speak for the people.
Michael J. Ferrier
