With the statement of coalition partner and Parliament President Sarah Wescot-Williams in today’s paper that she no longer expects a change in the Constitution to stop so-called ship-jumping in time for the September 26 vote (see related story), the main electoral reform called for by Governor Eugene Holiday when he installed the interim William Marlin Cabinet
can be considered officially dead.
Five different Councils of Ministers since country status was achieved per 10-10-10 had sparked complaints about political instability and lack of continuity regarding public policies. But the solution of not allowing of parliamentarians who break with their parties and declare themselves independent to be part of majorities that can install governments conflicted with the free mandate principle that is also reflected in the oath of office to exercise the function in good conscience – and consequently not necessarily along party lines.
Moreover, the proposal would in effect create two kinds of seats in the legislature, one of greater value than the other. This could also lead to a “lame duck” impasse with a “new majority” that can’t change the Government but is still able to boycott it in Parliament.
The idea of a Code of Conduct for the parties sounds good, but just like earlier suggestions to have candidates sign contracts to give up the seat should they leave their fraction, if push comes to shove these are obviously overruled by the Constitution as the highest law of the land.
