Dear Editor,
In the paper of March 26th on the front page, I read the article PM submits advisory on governor's constitutional role, and my first reaction was "Even up there?" But later I said to myself what can one expect when the Constitution does not exact that leaders of government should have an education.
I have repeated several times that Civics of the country should be taught from the fifth grade in order that the youth of the land could grow up with a sense of belonging and would be well versed in the Constitution of the land and eventually become a well polished politician and or statement.
This would also avoid the embarrassment of who having to tell who to pull up whose sock. Now this. Over the years that I have written to you I have not written anything discriminatory against homosexuals, but if I understand the autonomy of man and woman I believe that promoting homosexuality is also promoting and contributing to the extinction of human beings. You cannot get turnip out of spinach.
I will be the last person to promote prostitution but if I have to choose out of two evils I will choose the lesser evil. I remember in a conversation with a group of people who literally were against homosexuality, the question of reproduction came up. The consensus was "not reproduction, you mean extinction".
"Because they take the Bible out the schools, they think they going bring in homosexuality. They lie! If two men or two women can't make children where will the homosexuals be coming from?
They going import them? Or maybe they going clone them? Or maybe they going pay normal couples to make children for them. Being on the job I know that jealousy among homosexual couples is much more prevalent and intense than among heterosexual couples. Animal yes, but peaceful I don't know.
Russell A SIMMONS
