Dear Editor,
After working for 41 years as a police officer in the Dutch Kingdom/ Netherlands Antilles, I believe I can say one or two things about certain customs. I have worked directly with European Dutch colleagues and have had some observations about their behavior. And their answer was always “Dat is toch niet een probleem?” (Why is that a problem?) The other thing that we always got in the clinch about is when speaking to me they would use “Jullie” (You all) and I would always stop them and let them know I am an individual and am not responsible for what other people (beside my children) do.
There are laws, rules and regulations governing everybody’s behavior. My job is to serve and protect everyone and because I was brought up to respect everyone’s opinion, I give everyone equal opportunity to what is reasonable.
There is a letter from Geert Hatzmann circulating on social media in which he has written not-so-nice things about our Prime Minister. It is written in Dutch and I did not recognize any German words in it so I assume that Geert Hatzman is a Dutchman. There are some expressions of racial discrimination as well as opinions about the voting list of the National Alliance. Question: Who has the final say when it comes to the Justice and Finances in the Kingdom? Where is the pressure to accept same-sex marriage in the kingdom coming from?
Can any political party put a gun to anyone’s head and tell them that they have to become a member of that party and postulate themselves? It is also alleged that the National Alliance party discriminates against whites and that there are no whites on the party’s list. Is it not always about votes and who can guarantee the most votes? I can say that being clannish is not going to get any groups or race a lot of votes.
I know that, because I am the one who is always writing to you concerning the education level of the Members of Parliament. And if the Dutch continue to address individuals with “jullie” they are definitely not going to get any votes and consequently not on any list. Despite what Hatzmann claims, when I go down the names on the National Alliance list there is a lady with the name Molanus.
Because Geert Hatzmann (who I believe partner is not white) claims that there are no whites on the National Alliance list, that confirms exactly what I have always alluded to. Who decided that when a black person and a white person have a child together that child is automatically considered to be black? If I am not mistaken only two people can make a child (children). Three people cannot make the same child. That is why DNA is final.
What about this? Father, Johannes Zijlstra. is white, mother, Perly White, is black, son Jan Zijlstra, born in Holland is registered/considered as black.. Where is it determined what determines the race of a child? When is it the father and when is the mother, or DNA?
From when I was a child I learned that when the fox couldn’t reach the grapes, he said that they were sour anyway. I do not know what is Geert Hartmann’s beef with the National Alliance, but it sounds like “Ik zal je noch eens krijgen.”
Apart from that I realize that the language used during several political campaign meetings is of low caliber and we can read and see the results on social media. Where is the love for country to keep the name of St. Maarten on a certain level?
No, not I believe, I know that each and every one of those members of Parliament have a good rapport with each other, but it is time enough they grow politically and stop from openly pretending to insult and ridicule each other, because it is not doing any good for St. Maarten. When they feel that they are getting away with murder one place, they are going to try it somewhere else and the result is proven to be that several of them have been indicted, locked up and even sentenced.
But what is worse, violence and destruction is becoming the thing of the day on St. Maarten. Yes, our St. Maarten, where up to now everybody comes because of the tranquil nature of the country. May I plead to the politicians via your paper to show maturity, campaign with dignity and conserve our sweet St. Maarten land. You cannot hide, your posters are all over the country, so the burden is on you to be civil with your discourse. Demonstrate maturity. Winning at all cost is losing.
Russell A. Simmons
Dear Editor,
One of the things that I often mention is that I was taught that if you cannot fix something then you should not criticize it. So let me ask this. If my name is Russell Simmons, and I am known for writing letters to the editor or only being interviewed on talk shows and then I decide to become a candidate on a political party in the government elections, how will people know who I am? I am asking this question because since I was a boy I know political parties making voting commercials during political electin times.
At the age of 10 years old I can remember that there were only two houses in the Village with a green flag. There was a PPA flag on 98 percent of the houses in the Village. So was the case with different towns and villages on Aruba. By the amount of flags on the houses in the different towns and villages the parties had an average of what the outcome of the elections would be.
There were owners of houses who did not prefer their political colour known, who forbade the tenants to raise political flags on their houses. Candidates gave out fliers and there were pickup trucks carrying a generator which generated current for the amplifiers and loudspeakers which the candidates used to annouce the upcoming political meetings and whatever other propaganda of their political party. With the advancement of technology parties developed different kinds of ways and means to enhance political propaganda One of those means is political posters.
The morning after postulation day there were green flags attached to the railing of A.J.C. Brouwer Road ranging from Cole Bay to Cay Hill. But besides that we have not seen that great amount of political flags all over the country. And then came the posters. which I believe are replacing the flags. I do not know what the difference in cost is, but I believe that the money which was formerly used to acquire the flags will be used to help with the cost of the posters. The Christmas and New Year came and all of a sudden the posters became a problem. Since 2010 how many elections have we had? Were there no posters during all those elections?
I believe that by now everyone should know that commercials are even geared towards kindergarteners. I will repeat: all of what is happening these days has happened in the past when things were rocky. Why is it that now that things are stabilizing, all of a sudden everything becomes a problem.
I will always encourage anyone to have an opinion and even publicize it, but if you are going to take time to put it on social media or have it published, I believe that a little research will help to ascertain the facts. And then one will not have to petition the editor to withhold his/her name in case it is published.. That kind of betrays similar behavior as the one or the situation that he/she is writing about.
I must admit, however, that if political parties (politicians) would show the same dedication for serving the community as they do to get elected the people would see them through a different light.
Russell A. Simmons
Dear Editor,
Mistakes are made by people who do work. Based on “no you have, yes you can get”, appealing and protesting against decisions taken has become the thing of the day.
Those of us who learned to count, calculate, multiply, do divisions by heart, etc. know that rounding does not give the precise answer, but is accepted. There are always figures after the comma. The same goes for calculators. So I would assume that if there are calculations retroactive from 2010, that also would be rounded figures from at least 12 years. Logic would tell me that these rounded figures would also have an influence on the outcome of those calculations of 12 years.
I am not a bookkeeper, but I know that different formulas are used in certain calculations. So is it realistic that mistakes will be made or alleged to be made? Yes.
We are at the dawn of a political election, so if I did not hear or read that several of those justice workers protested because of mistakes made, I would be surprised, because that is what the norm of politics in St. Maarten is today. Instead of governing along with the coalition government in the interest of the people, members of parliament who have declared themselves opposition lay and wait, hoping that mistakes will be made, all to the detriment of the people in the country.
Because of elections, members of the coalition that sustained the government, all of a sudden, show their true colors by discrediting so much that they themselves cosigned for, simply because they are not mature enough to realize that they are publicly discrediting themselves.
For a while, decisions were taken how to go about increasing the old age pension, but people in government who think that because of old age the pensioners are stupid, they postpone the payment of the increase in old age pension until close to the election date, hoping to influence the seniors to vote for those responsible for the increase.
I am not in possession of the information, but I am of the opinion that the formula that Minister Richard Panneflek applied for the last increase in pension was not the same applied this time. I believe that Panneflek’s formula was the right formula. So, again, our politicians are putting the voters on a bus. I believe that this is a bus to nowhere.
There are more things I can state about this kind behavior, but that should not come from me, it should come from all of those people on those posters who claim that they can fix things.
I do not feel that I am out of place writing this way because since 2010 this has been the modus operandi of aspiring MPs.
The latest, what I think I can call a gimmick, is the bank book proposed by MP Bryson. My observation about that is that I believe people should have money to be able to deal with a bank. Or is there enough money to go around that MP Brison is not telling us about? Because the prices at the supermarkets are increasing daily, yes, daily, my spending power is decreasing. A whole lot of the people in St. Maarten, their bank is a slot-machine in the casino or a number booth located in the direct vicinity of almost every supermarket.
As it is now, government has obliged their employees to collect their salaries via the banks. Whether it is at the ATM machine or from the teller, obliging the people to pay for every transaction they make via the bank. Even if one would say, “My expenditures add up to 2,000 guilders this month, I'm going to take off 2,000 guilders to save on the administrative cost,” this is not possible because there is a maximum withdrawal per day, obliging one to pay for at the least two to three withdrawals.
I’ve mentioned before that I am not a bookkeeper, but if everybody go online, would not the banks be empty? And would not that mean less employees? So why are the bank employees encouraging people to go online?
Russell A. Simmons
Dear Editor,
As I drive around St. Maarten, including some places on the French side, I am amazed the amount money and effort that has gone into putting up all these political billboards campaigning for the very-soon-to-be-held elections.
I would like to state if this amount of effort was harnessed to improve the lives of all St. Maarten residents and the country in general I am sure we would be living in a much better place.
Another inescapable fact is the huge number of candidates postulating for a few positions in the political arena, which leads me to only two possible conclusions:
1. We have so many well intentioned persons who genuinely want to put country before self, hmmm?
2. The salary and benefits afforded to those few that get elected is so high that it attracts Tom, Dick and Harry to want to get a piece of the political pie.
In conclusion, if the salary and benefits of the elected officials were reduced drastically to say that of a medium level manager here in SXM, would we see such a feverish political campaign or would we see those devoted to the betterment of St. Maarten and its people?
Last piece of advice: use the votes for the right person and reason, St. Maarten is losing ground and cannot afford to lose more.
A very concerned St. Maarten resident
Name withheld at author’s request.
Dear Editor,
Time is important because, on this earth, nothing lasts forever.
Before January 11, 2024, I want every voter to think about and ask themselves this question: Am I voting for a person for all the right reasons?
Am I voting for a person because they are a family member or because they are popular?
A long time ago, I used to vote for people who had an education, telling myself that because they had an education, they were good candidates.
Sorry to say, having an education does not qualify you; it is only part of the qualification.
The most important things that embody a good leader are good moral character and lifestyle, but the cream of the crop that qualifies a person is sincerely good intent and willingness to sacrifice themself for the country.
That is the real qualification. Having an education is good for your personal development, but that does not make you good.
Doing good is a choice, even if it means sacrificing yourself, as Jesus did for us. I can prove I am correct; take the United States, Canada, Europe, China, and Australia. Look at their resume.
Most of the leaders in those countries have high qualifications but look at what they produce:
They enact wicked legislation protecting immorality and punish people who expose corruption.
They promote what God forbids and silence people who call them out for the insanity of the destruction they are doing to the human race.
They force men who say they are women (transgender) to compete against women but still claim they believe in women's rights.
Those policies create disastrous behaviors and destruction in the family. We are creating a nasty quality of life for humans, but then calling that nasty life a human right.
The point is this: those are people with evil intentions who are out to control you, and you should not be voting for them.
In St. Maarten’s case, I do not know if they will have debates. They should; a person’s world-view shows you how that person thinks and what to expect from him or her.
I know some poor people who did not have a chance to have an education (my loving mother). She sacrificed herself and worked 2 and 3 jobs to give us a better quality of life than she had.
That is a leader who sacrifices and does not think of himself or herself. People with that kind of good moral character are what we need to lead St. Maarten.
The formula for a truly good leader is GF+GC+GLS+E=GL (God first, good character, a good lifestyle, and education = a good leader).
Most of us will not have all four. But without number 1, which is GF (God first), the result is guaranteed destruction.
You might create wealth, but a nasty lifestyle and bad character will create criminality and destruction, which will cost the country money and lead back to poverty.
Conclusion: We need to find people who are willing to sacrifice their lives for the country and whose choice is to please the masses and create wealth, along with enacting the right legislation that produces wealth.
The Patriot Miguel Arrindell
