Venex Curaçao’s stand on ‘Toma de Caracas’

(from Amigoe.com)

For several weeks, the “Mesa de la Unidad Democrática” of Venezuela has been calling for an event named “Toma de Caracas” or Taking Caracas. This event is nothing but a march to demand the “Consejo Nacional Electoral” (CNE) or Venezuelan electoral body, to respect the terms established in the regulations implemented by themselves in 2007, in order for the Recall Referendum (RR) against President Nicolás Maduro to be held this year. To show support for this event, many cities around the world where there is significant presence of Venezuelan citizens have decided to join in on the protest in different ways.

Those of us who constitute the Venex Curaçao Foundation, as always, concerned with maintaining the best relations between our citizens and the local community, of which we are part, have chosen not to make any mobilization. However, we believe that the best solution for the Venezuelan conflict is the return to democratic normality. For this reason, we once again ask for the local leaders to accompany us with their voice – not in any particular political trend – as an appeal for the unconditional respect for democratic values and human rights in our country.

According to the current Venezuelan constitution, any official elected by popular vote – including the president – may be revoked from office after half the term has elapsed by holding a Recall Referendum. In practice, the RR is a constitutional exit door for lengthy Venezuelan presidential terms – usually consisting of six years without a set limit for re-election.

What is there to know about the Venezuelan Recall Referendum? The Recall Referendum is a right that Venezuelan citizens have and was established in the Constitution of 1999. Its promotion can neither be considered, in any respect, as an act of political destabilization nor a favour granted to the people by their rulers.

A RR can be summoned by collecting a particular amount of signatures of not less than 20 per cent of the number of voters – this is the only requirement in the Constitution of 1999. If it is requested, and the option to revoke the president exceeds the number of votes obtained by the same at the time of his/her election, he/she must immediately cease his/her functions.

If the president leaves office before his/her fourth year in office, then new elections must be called; otherwise, according to article 233 of the “Constitución de la República Bolivariana de Venezuela,” the Vice President would be responsible for completing the period.

What stage is the process of activating the Recall Referendum in Venezuela currently in? In 2007, the CNE drafted a provisional regulation to control the referenda processes that included a list of additional requirements to hinder activation thereof. Among these new requirements are: the initial collection of 2,500 signatures – which has already been surpassed; a second collection of one per cent of voters, also surpassed, and its subsequent review by the electoral body.

It is important to note that each of the added steps in the regulation of 2007 has a time limit, both for the organisers and for the electoral body. However, while the proponents of the Recall Referendum have been forced to strictly comply with the time limits imposed, the CNE has consistently failed to meet lapses established by its own rules. There is no doubt that the Venezuelan National Electoral Council CNE, itself, has been delaying the Recall Referendum to guarantee the permanence in office of the ruling party until 2019.

What other steps need to be taken in order to activate the Presidential Recall Referendum? Given that all the requirements noted above have already been fulfilled, the CNE must announce the date on which voters will be called to (finally) give their signatures for the activation of the referendum. The number of voters should be not less than 20 per cent of the total – nearly four million signatures. Once this is done, then CNE would be forced to convoke the referendum act.

Can the Recall Referendum take place this year? Any study of the phases and periods described in the regulations of 2007 reveals that the recall process can be performed in the month of November this year. Proof of this is, that at a press conference of the Rector Lucena nationally broadcast weeks ago, the CNE was given the task of undertaking a list of additional assignments – not covered by regulations – that, in her opinion, greatly hinders the realization of the event this year.

That detailed explanation by the highest electoral authority makes it clear to the public that the regular phases of the regulation would allow the referendum to take place this year, but activities “unregulated” could prevent this. The lapses established in the regulations are authored by the CNE in them the rules of the process for both parties are described. Respect for the established standards can neither be optional for the organizers nor for the electoral body.

What exactly is “Toma de Caracas’” or Taking Caracas? Given the evident intention of the Venezuelan electoral body to delay the recall referendum, the Venezuelan opposition has made a call to attend a demonstration on the first day of September in the city of Caracas. The aim of the march is simply to demand respect for the electoral law, which gives the citizens a right to decide, according to the current constitution, if they wish to follow Nicolás Maduro at the helm of the presidency or not.

Why is the situation in Venezuela of so much importance for the neighbouring countries? The rapid deterioration of the living conditions of the Venezuelan people has recently come to levels of a humanitarian crisis. Compatriots leaving the country today have ceased to be traditional migrants to become survivors. This is important to understand, because people often tend to judge migrants without understanding that – in most cases – these are victims of governments that many outside Venezuela are sympathetic with.

Peaceful change in the political leadership of Venezuela would slow the exodus of Venezuelans outward. In fact, we are convinced that in the short term it could start a process of repatriation of many of the families who have been forced to leave their households due to the circumstances of the country.

It is for this reason that we insist that neighbouring countries should be the first to show interest for the unhindered continuation of the electoral output, and for the right of the Venezuelan people to decide on the continuation of the current government and its clearly wrong policies to be respected.

What are we asking for? We are asking the leaders of political parties and discourse of Curaçao to be very attentive to what happens in Venezuela, not only because the current government has been systematically violating international standards of human rights, but also because we are convinced that peaceful change in our country is the best solution to the migration problems of the region. We understand that in the international arena countries should mutually respect the internal affairs of other countries. However, just as we believe that the economy, education and family hygiene are private matters, but domestic violence requires the complaint to protect innocent victims.

Likewise, respect for human rights and democratic values are not necessarily just the internal affairs of countries. As in the case of domestic violence or police brutality, to remain silent out of respect for self-determination, for neutrality or for political expediency is complicity.

The situation in Venezuela must be resolved by the citizens of Venezuela. No one in the government or in opposition want any foreign government to solve our problems. However, we are convinced that without international pressure it is unlikely that current Venezuelan leaders respect the democratic game.

Democracy, like human rights, cannot be an internal matter for each country. They are the common rules of the countries and are meant to protect all citizens alike. The responsibility for monitoring compliance lies on everyone.

Fundacion Venex Curaçao

Curaçao

Advocating breakfast programme, free scholarships for our youth

Dear Editor,

I will once again be championing two particular issues pertaining to youth that may not be “flashy” but are nonetheless more essential than many realise.

I am a family man of faith, who believes that children should be protected, nurtured and taught our core values at home, in the community and in the house of the Lord. These values should then be reinforced in schools.

Our youth is our future, as they are the ones to grow up, leave our island to further their studies and return to occupy key positions in our community and lead our country forward. However, this can only be done, if and when we start to recognise their role in our society.

I truly believe that focus should be placed on a number of specific matters, which is the reason I introduced/championed the following:

I believe we need to ensure that every morning our youth attend school on a full stomach. It is for this reason I initiated the breakfast programme together with the management of Princess Juliana International Airport and Goddard Catering as Member of Parliament in 2014. It is my vision that our Public schools continue to benefit from this great initiative and also broaden this project to ensure students from the subsidised schools have the same opportunity to attend school on a full stomach.

Every student with a tertiary education degree is a student with increased chances of getting a steady job, allowing them to be in a better position to help themselves and their family members. It is for this reason that I, in 2013 and 2014 initiated and personally took up the lead role in getting MOU’s signed with Newark, New Jersey and the Commonwealth of Dominica ensuring free scholarship opportunities in the fields of Art, Medicine and Agriculture.

I worked tirelessly for two years to get this accomplished for the youth of St. Maarten. While these MOU’s have been signed by our Counterparts, the Council of Ministers has yet to ratify these MOU’s. I am asking you for the opportunity to ensure that this time around they will be ratified and the proper procedures and policies will be put in place as soon as possible. Enough is enough, it is also time for us to create job opportunities for them, coach them and then step aside for them to take control of their future.

Romain Laville

Candidate #7 on the United St. Maarten Party (US Party) list

Nowhere for the water to run off

Dear Editor,

I would like to use this space to address the situation in Beacon Hill with the rain water that collects on the road in front of Alegria and Sunset Beach Bar.

There is nowhere for the water to run off, as the powers that be at the airport filled in the ditch that ran along the inside of the fence that was used for runoff. This water becomes stagnant with the residue from the garbage shed at the road in front of the resort making it unhealthy and it smells.

Why wasn’t the airport responsible for making an alternate water runoff?

This water sits for weeks at a time if the rain is persistent and it creates such a bad traffic situation and potholes that could seriously damage cars and people.

It would be nice if the Government, Public Works or maybe VROMI looked into this mess. I’m sure my neighbours and visitors of the island would appreciate it too.

Mary Lou Nipper

Beacon Hill resident

MP De Weever: Politics should not be played with the people’s health

A letter printed in the opinion section of this newspaper was erroneously attributed to Roddy Heyliger. The email he sent clearly stated that it was a press release from Member of Parliament (MP) Cornelius de Weever. Mr. Heyliger had no part in writing the release and was only asked to circulate it to the media by a third party. The Daily Herald sincerely apologizes for this unfortunate error and any inconvenience it may have cause those involved.

What exactly do they mean?

Dear Editor,

The election period is one where many new ideas are born. Numerous candidates have already made statements on taxation. Through the medium of your newspaper I would like to address the following questions to those candidates who have made statements:

Gracita Arrindell (PPA) has proposed a property tax. Would this tax be on used and unused property? Would it be on the value or the rental produced? How would the tax be calculated and if the calculation is to be on property value, who would do the evaluation and what would be the cost of setting up this institution?

Frans Richardson (US Party) has proposed replacing all personal taxes with indirect taxes. Has he calculated the cost of conversion from one tax system to another? Has he considered the VAT model over the Sales Tax model? Why does he believe that poor people will be less burdened by indirect taxes compared to direct taxes?

Maria Buncamper (US Party) has said that there are neighbouring islands that have eliminated profit tax. Which territories is she referring to?

Richard Gibson (NA): How badly is the present TOT structure impacting our economy presently and limiting job creation?

The discussion of taxation is an important one as country St. Maarten should be looking to ensure that our tax system not only minimises the negative impact on our less fortunate, but also maximises the incentive for economic opportunity and to ensure sufficient public revenue to allow for investment in critical projects.

Robbie Ferron

The Daily Herald

Copyright © 2025 All copyrights on articles and/or content of The Caribbean Herald N.V. dba The Daily Herald are reserved.


Without permission of The Daily Herald no copyrighted content may be used by anyone.

Comodo SSL
mastercard.png
visa.png

Hosted by

SiteGround
© 2026 The Daily Herald. All Rights Reserved.